Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234487›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2023

Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and umbilical cord tissue in regeneration of a full-thickness tendon defect

Ji-Hye Yea, Yeasol Kim, Chris H Jo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TiOBioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji-Hye YeaDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yeasol KimDepartment of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chris H JoDepartment of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be obtained from various tissues such as bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood (UCB) and umbilical cord tissue (UC), the comparative efficacy of each MSC in tendon regeneration is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of MSCs isolated from three different sources on tendon regeneration after injury. We evaluated the potential of BM-, UCB- and UC-MSC to differentiate into tendon-like cells in tensioned three-dimensional construct (T-3D) using gene and histological analysis. In animal experiments, full-thickness tendon defect (FTD) was created in supraspinatus of rats, and injected with Saline and BM-, UCB- and UC-MSC. After two and four weeks, histological evaluations were performed. After inducing tenogenic differentiation, the gene expression of scleraxis, mohawk, type I collagen and tenascin-C was upregulated by 3.12-, 5.92-, 6.01- and 1.61-fold respectively and formation of tendon-like matrix was increased 4.22-fold in UC-MSC compared to BM-MSC in T-3D. In animal experiments, the total degeneration score was lower in the UC-MSC group than in BM-MSC group at both weeks. In heterotopic matrix formation, glycosaminoglycan-rich area was reduced in the UC-MSC group, whereas area was larger in the BM-MSC group than in Saline group at four weeks. In conclusion,

Indexed as

Bone marrowMesenchymal stem cellsShoulder painTendon regenerationUmbilical cord

Identifiers

PMID37234487
PMCPMC10206173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.