Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234461›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2023

Finding MRI features to obviate the need of repeat spinal biopsies in clinically suspected persistent or recurrent spinal osteomyelitis.

Stephany Barreto, Salil Sharma, Gaurav Cheraya, Amar Swarnkar, Kent Ogden, Rajiv Mangla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephany BarretoSUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Salil SharmaMary ImogeneBassettHospital, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA.
Gaurav CherayaYale New Haven Health Bridgeport Hospital, USA.
Amar SwarnkarSUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Kent OgdenSUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Rajiv ManglaSUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features that could help differen-tiate the bone destruction due to persistent/recurrent spine infection from worsening bone destruction due to mechanical factors, which could help obviate the need for repeat spine biopsy. Material and methods: A retrospective study was performed on selected subjects who were more than 18 years of age, were diagnosed with infectious spondylodiscitis, underwent at least 2 spinal interventions for the diagnosis at the same level, and had MRI prior to each image-guided intervention. Both MRI studies were analysed for vertebral body changes, paravertebral collections, epidural thickening and collections, bone marrow signal changes, loss of vertebral body height, abnormal signal in intervertebral disc, and loss of disc height. Results: We observed that worsening of changes in paravertebral and epidural soft tissue were statistically more significant predictors of recurrent/persistent spine infection ( Conclusions: In patients of infectious spondylitis with suspected recurrence, the most common and pronounced MRI findings of worsening osseous changes can be deceiving and can result in negative repeat spinal biopsy. Changes in paraspinal and epidural soft tissues are more helpful in identifying the cause of worsening bone destruction. Correlation with clinical examination, inflammatory markers, and observing soft tissue changes on follow-up MRI is a more reliable way to identify patients who may benefit from repeat spine biopsy.

Indexed as

infectious spondylodiscitisMRIrecurrent infectionspinal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37234461
PMCPMC10207303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.