ArticleEplasty2023
Treatment of Stage 4 Pressure Injuries With Autologous Heterogenous Skin Construct: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Eplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a challenging problem in health care affecting 2.5 million people per year in the US, with 60,000 deaths directly attributed to PIs annually. Surgical closure is the treatment of choice for stage 3 and 4 PIs, but with complication rates of 59% to 73%, less invasive and more effective treatments are needed. Autologous heterogeneous skin construct (AHSC) is a novel autograft made from a small full-thickness harvest of healthy skin. This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to determine the effectiveness of AHSC in the treatment of recalcitrant stage 4 pressure injuries. Methods: All data were collected retrospectively. The primary efficacy outcome was complete wound closure. Secondary efficacy outcomes included percent area reduction, percent volume reduction, and coverage of exposed structures. Results: Seventeen patients with 22 wounds were treated with AHSC. Complete closure was achieved in 50% of patients in a mean time of 146 (SD ± 93) days, and the percent area and volume reductions were 69% and 81%, respectively. A 95% volume reduction was achieved in 68.2% of patients at a mean time of 106 (SD ± 83) days, and critical structures were fully covered in 95% of patients in a mean time of 33 (SD ± 19) days. After AHSC treatment, there was a mean decrease of 1.65 hospital admissions ( Conclusions: AHSC demonstrated the ability to cover exposed structures, restore wound volume, and achieve durable wound closure in chronic refractory stage 4 PIs with better closure and recurrence rates than current surgical and nonsurgical treatments. AHSC represents a minimally invasive alternative to reconstructive flap surgery that preserves future reconstructive options while minimizing donor-site morbidity and promoting improved patient health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37234455PMC10205861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.