ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Unravelling the role of immunohistochemistry in giant cell lesions of jaws: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Podoplanin immunoexpression in odontogenic lesions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and integrated bioinformatic analysis.Diagnostic pathology · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of CD3 and CD20 Lymphocytes and Mast Cells in the Microenvironment of Central Giant Cell Granuloma, Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma, and Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Central Giant Cell Granuloma of the Mandible and Maxilla: A Clinicopathological Study of 21 Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
- Thoughts on the Etiology of Cherubism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controversies exist in literature regarding nature, pathogenesis, and behaviour of giant cell lesions (GCLs) of jaws. Studies were attempted to solve these mysteries with immunohistochemical analysis, using various biological markers. Thus, the aim of this review is to appraise the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in evaluating the pathogenesis, cellular phenotype, nature, and behaviour of GCLs of jaws. PubMed, PubMed Central, and Clinical Key (Medline) databases were searched electronically irrespective of date of publication with assortment of several independent terms. Fifty-five articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the review. Out of 55 included articles, 49 were associated with nature, pathogenesis, and behaviour and six articles were associated with treatment and outcome prediction. Although IHC solved some of the controversies associated with GCLs of jaws such as the osteoclastic phenotype of multinucleated giant cells, immunoexpression of proliferative markers does not distinct non-aggressive from aggressive central GCL but the nature, histogenesis, pathogenesis, and exact behaviour still remain debatable. With regard to formulation of treatment plan, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that expression of glucocorticoid and calcitonin receptors could act as a tool to decide the therapeutic strategy and aid in therapeutic adjustments according to evolution of the lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.