Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37233897›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2023

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Tadashi Terui, Yukari Okubo, Satomi Kobayashi, Shigetoshi Sano, Akimichi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, Yayoi Tada, Masatoshi Abe, Masafumi Yaguchi, Natsuka Uehara and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04057937 (A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04057937 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) in the Treatment of Palmoplantar Pustulosis in Japan

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2019 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsPalmoplantaris PustulosisArmsApremilast, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Ethnic Differences of Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Systematic Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Apremilast in Japanese patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: A randomized, Phase 3 trial.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Palmoplantar pustulosis: pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and treatment.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psoriasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Tadashi TeruiNihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchikamicho, Itabashi, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. terui.tadashi@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-4311
Yukari OkuboTokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-1259
Satomi KobayashiSeibo International Catholic Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigetoshi SanoKochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.
Akimichi MoritaNagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-3754
Shinichi ImafukuFukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yayoi TadaTeikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-135X
Masatoshi AbeSapporo Skin Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Masafumi YaguchiAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Natsuka UeharaAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro HandaAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki TanakaAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Wendy ZhangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Maria ParisAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Masamoto MurakamiEhime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Amgen (United States) · USEhime University · JPFukuoka University · JPKōchi University · JPNagoya City University · JPNihon University · JPSapporo Science Center · JPTeikyo University Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JPYokohama City Seibu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment.

methodsThis phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient's visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain).

resultsA total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (P = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal P = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal P ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea.

conclusionsApremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Indexed as

East Asian PeoplePsoriasisDouble-Blind MethodHumansPainPruritusSeverity of Illness IndexThalidomideTreatment OutcomeapremilastThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID37233897
PMCPMC10213585
OpenAlexW4378349119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.