ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Extending bioelectric navigation for displacement and direction detection.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBioelectric navigation is a navigation modality for minimally invasive endovascular procedures promising non-fluoroscopic navigation. However, the method offers only limited navigation accuracy between anatomical features and expects the tracked catheter to move only in one direction at all times. We propose to extend bioelectric navigation with additional sensing capabilities, allowing for the estimation of the distance traveled by the catheter, thereby improving accuracy between feature locations and allowing to track also under alternating forward- and backward motion.
methodsWe perform experiments in finite element method (FEM) simulations and in a 3D printed phantom. A solution for estimating the traveled distance using a stationary electrode is proposed, together with an approach on how to evaluate the signals obtained with this additional electrode. We investigate the effects of surrounding tissue conductance on this approach. Finally, the approach is refined in order to mitigate the effects of parallel conductance on the navigation accuracy.
resultsThe approach allows to estimate the catheter movement direction and the distance traveled. Simulations show absolute errors below 0.89 mm for non-conducting surrounding tissue, but errors up to 60.27 mm when the tissue is electrically conductive. This effect can be mitigated by a more sophisticated modeling (errors up to 33.96 mm). In experiments in a 3D printed phantom, the mean absolute error over 6 catheter paths is 6.3 mm, with standard deviations smaller than or equal to 1.1 mm.
conclusionsExtending the setup of bioelectric navigation with an additional stationary electrode allows to estimate the distance traveled by the catheter, as well as the movement direction. The effects of parallel conductive tissue could be partially mitigated in simulations, but further research is needed to investigate these effects in real biological tissue, and to bring the introduced errors down to a clinically acceptable level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.