Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37233833›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2023

The resilient cotton plant: uncovering the effects of stresses on secondary metabolomics and its underlying molecular mechanisms.

Suraj Prakash, Manoj Kumar, Radha, Sunil Kumar, Susan Jaconis, E Parameswari, Kanika Sharma, Sangram Dhumal, Marisennayya Senapathy, Vishal P Deshmukh and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elucidating the Underlying Allelopathy Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Suraj Prakash *School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India.
Manoj Kumar *Chemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, 400019, India.
RadhaSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India. radhuchauhan7002@gmail.com.
Sunil KumarIndian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, 250110, India.
Susan JaconisAgricultural & Environmental Research Department, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC, 27513, USA.
E ParameswariNammazhvar Organic Farming Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, 641 003, Coimbatore, India.
Kanika SharmaChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, 400019, India.
Sangram DhumalDivision of Horticulture, RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur, 416004, India.
Marisennayya SenapathyDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Vishal P DeshmukhBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Yashwantrao Mohite Institute of Management, Karad, India.
Abhijit DeyDepartment of Life Sciences, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, 700073, West Bengal, India.
José M LorenzoCentro Tecnológico de La Carne de Galicia, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, Avd. Galicia N° 4, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900, Ourense, Spain.
Vijay SheriDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, 27858, USA.
Baohong ZhangDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, 27858, USA. zhangb@ecu.edu.
Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology · INEast Carolina University · USShoolini University · INBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INCotton (United States) · USPresidency University · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · INUniversidade de Vigo · ESWolaita Sodo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotton is an important fiber crop cultivated around the world under diverse climate conditions and generates billions of dollars in annual revenue globally. Biotic and abiotic stresses have caused reduction in yield and productivity of cotton crops. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed and summarized the effect of biotic and abiotic stress on secondary metabolite production in cotton. The development of cotton varieties with improved tolerance against abiotic and biotic stress can play an important role in sustainable cotton production. Under stress conditions, plants develop a variety of defense mechanisms such as initiating signaling functions to upregulate defense responsive genes and accumulation of secondary metabolites. Understanding the impact of stress on secondary metabolite production in cotton is crucial for developing strategies to alleviate the negative effects of stress on crop yield and quality. Further, the potential industrial applications of these secondary metabolites in cotton, such as gossypol, could provide new opportunities for sustainable cotton production and the development of value-added products. Additionally, transgenic and genome-edited cotton cultivars can be developed to provide tolerance to both abiotic and biotic stress in cotton production.

Indexed as

GossypiumMetabolomicsStress, PhysiologicalCottonGossypiumMetabolomicsProteomicsSecondary metabolitesStress

Identifiers

PMID37233833
OpenAlexW4378349632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.