ArticleMembranes2023
Forward Osmosis for Metal Processing Effluents under Similar Osmotic Pressure Gradients.
Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dewatering Hypersaline NaMembranes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water recovery from aqueous effluents in the mining and metals processing industry poses a unique challenge due to the high concentration of dissolved salts typically requiring energy intensive methods of treatment. Forward osmosis (FO) is a lower energy technology which employs a draw solution to osmotically extract water through a semi-permeable membrane further concentrating any feed. Successful FO operation relies on using a draw solution of higher osmotic pressure than the feed to extract water while minimizing concentration polarization to maximize the water flux. Previous studies employing FO on industrial feed samples commonly used concentration instead of osmotic pressures for feed and draw characterization; this led to misleading conclusions on the impact of design variables on water flux performance. By employing a factorial design of experiments methodology, this study examined the independent and interactive effects on water flux by: osmotic pressure gradient, crossflow velocity, draw salt type, and membrane orientation. With a commercial FO membrane, this work tested a solvent extraction raffinate and a mine water effluent sample to demonstrate application significance. By optimizing with osmotic gradient independent variables, water flux can be improved by over 30% without increasing energy costs or compromising the 95-99% salt rejection of the membrane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.