ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of galactomannan in tracheobronchial aspirate forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) can occur in immunocompromised patients, and an early detection and intensive treatment are crucial. We sought to determine the potential of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen titer (AGT) in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum titers of beta-D-glucan (BDG) to predict IPA in lung transplantation recipients, as opposed to pneumonia unrelated to IPA. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 192 lung transplant recipients. Overall, 26 recipients had been diagnosed with proven IPA, 40 recipients with probable IPA, and 75 recipients with pneumonia unrelated to IPA. We analyzed AGT levels in IPA and non-IPA pneumonia patients and used ROC curves to determine the diagnostic cutoff value. The Serum AGT cutoff value was 0.560 (index level), with a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 91%, and AUC of 0.724, and the BALF AGT cutoff value was 0.600, with a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 85%, and AUC of 0.895. Revised EORTC suggests a diagnostic cutoff value of 1.0 in both serum and BALF AGT when IPA is highly suspicious. In our group, serum AGT of 1.0 showed a sensitivity of 27% and a specificity of 97%, and BALF AGT of 1.0 showed a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 95%. The result suggested that a lower cutoff could be beneficial in the lung transplant group. In multivariable analysis, serum and BALF AGT, with a minimal correlation between the two, showed a correlation with a history of diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.