Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37233078›Full record

ArticleInsects2023

Review of Kissing Bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) from China with Descriptions of Two New Species.

Yisheng Zhao, Mingyuan Fan, Hu Li, Wanzhi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Omics Tools Applied to the Study of Chagas Disease Vectors: Proteomics and Metabolomics.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Approaches to the Ecology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome report: First whole genome sequence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yisheng ZhaoDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Mingyuan FanDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hu LiDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8590-1753
Wanzhi CaiDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

2155 Talent Development program of China Agricultural University 2155 Talent Development program of China Agricultural UniversityBiodiversity Survey and Assessment Project of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China 2019HJ2096001006China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M720169National Natural Science Foundation of China 32120103006National Natural Science Foundation of China 32200377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triatominae, the only blood-sucking subfamily in Reduviidae, are the vectors of Chagas disease. The majority of them are distributed in the Americas, while the diversity in China has been underestimated, as only two species have been recorded. Here, we describe two new species from China,

Indexed as

Chinese Triatominaegenitaliakeytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID37233078
PMCPMC10231107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.