Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37232820›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Active Immune Phenotype in Head and Neck Cancer: Reevaluating the Iso-Effect Fractionation Based on the Linear Quadratic (LQ) Model-A Narrative Review.

Camil Ciprian Mireștean, Roxana Irina Iancu, Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camil Ciprian MireșteanDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6212-8008
Roxana Irina IancuFaculty of Dental Medicine, Oral Pathology Department, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Dragoș Petru Teodor IancuFaculty of Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Department, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered fractionation concepts and especially moderate hypo-fractionation are evaluated as alternatives to standard treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), associated with or not concurrent with or sequential to chemotherapy. The calculation of the iso-equivalent dose regimens has as its starting point the linear quadratic (LQ) formalism traditionally based on the "4Rs" of radiobiology. The higher rates of therapeutic failure after radiotherapy of HNSCC are associated with the heterogeneity of radio-sensibility. The identification of genetic signatures and radio-resistance scores aims to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy and to conceptualize personalized fractionation schemes. The new data regarding the involvement of the sixth "R" of radiobiology in HNSCC, especially for the HPV-driven subtype, but also for the "immune active" minority of HPV-negative HNSCCs, bring to the fore a multifactorial variation of the

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansLinear ModelsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neckhead and neck cancerHNSCCHPVimmune activeimmune exhaustedlinear quadratic (LQ) modelradio-resistanceradio-sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID37232820
PMCPMC10216985
OpenAlexW4375862356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.