ArticleJournal of proteome research2023
AIomics: Exploring More of the Proteome Using Mass Spectral Libraries Extended by Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in mass spectrometry-based analysis of traditional Chinese medicine: compound identification and metabolic pathway elucidation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Rescoring Peptide Spectrum Matches: Boosting Proteomics Performance by Integrating Peptide Property Predictors Into Peptide Identification.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Review
- SingPro: a knowledge base providing single-cell proteomic data.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The unbounded permutations of biological molecules, including proteins and their constituent peptides, present a dilemma in identifying the components of complex biosamples. Sequence search algorithms used to identify peptide spectra can be expanded to cover larger classes of molecules, including more modifications, isoforms, and atypical cleavage, but at the cost of false positives or false negatives due to the simplified spectra they compute from sequence records. Spectral library searching can help solve this issue by precisely matching experimental spectra to library spectra with excellent sensitivity and specificity. However, compiling spectral libraries that span entire proteomes is pragmatically difficult. Neural networks that predict complete spectra containing a full range of annotated and unannotated ions can be used to replace these simplified spectra with libraries of fully predicted spectra, including modified peptides. Using such a network, we created predicted spectral libraries that were used to rescore matches from a sequence search done over a large search space, including a large number of modifications. Rescoring improved the separation of true and false hits by 82%, yielding an 8% increase in peptide identifications, including a 21% increase in nonspecifically cleaved peptides and a 17% increase in phosphopeptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.