Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37232493›Full record

Trial reporteLife2023

Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening and motivators for at-home human papillomavirus self-sampling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a telephone survey.

Susan Parker, Ashish A Deshmukh, Baojiang Chen, David R Lairson, Maria Daheri, Sally W Vernon, Jane R Montealegre

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03898167 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mailed Self-Sample HPV Testing to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Among Minority/Underserved Women in an Integrated Safety Net Healthcare System), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03898167 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mailed Self-Sample HPV Testing to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Among Minority/Underserved Women in an Integrated Safety Net Healthcare System

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2020 to 2025Enrolled2,474ConditionsCervical Cancer, Human Papillomavirus InfectionArmsTelephone Recall, Mailed HPV Self-Sampling Kit, Patient Navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan ParkerBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6722-4717
Ashish A DeshmukhMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Baojiang ChenUTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, United States.
David R LairsonUTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, United States.
Maria DaheriHarris Health System, Houston, United States.
Sally W VernonUTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, United States.
Jane R MontealegreBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Expanding a pragmatic randomized trial to assess mailed self-sample HPV testing to increase cervical cancer screening participation among Asian immigrant women in a safety net health systemR01MD013715 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MONTEALEGRE, JANE R · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing may be an alternative for women not attending clinic-based cervical cancer screening. Methods: We assessed barriers to care and motivators to use at-home HPV self-sampling kits during the COVID-19 pandemic as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating kit effectiveness. Participants were women aged 30-65 and under-screened for cervical cancer in a safety-net healthcare system. We conducted telephone surveys in English/Spanish among a subgroup of trial participants, assessed differences between groups, and determined statistical significance at p<0.05. Results: Over half of 233 survey participants reported that clinic-based screening (Pap) is uncomfortable (67.8%), embarrassing (52.4%), and discomfort seeing male providers (63.1%). The last two factors were significantly more prevalent among Spanish vs English speakers (66.4% vs 30% (p=0.000) and 69.9 vs 52.2% (p=0.006), respectively). Most women who completed the kit found Pap more embarrassing (69.3%), stressful (55.6%), and less convenient (55.6%) than the kit. The first factor was more prevalent among Spanish vs English speakers (79.6% vs 53.38%, p=0.001) and among patients with elementary education or below. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced most (59.5%) to participate in the trial due to fear of COVID, difficulty making appointments, and ease of using kits. HPV self-sampling kits may reduce barriers among under-screened women in a safety-net system. Funding: This study is supported by a grant from the National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparitie s (NIMHD, R01MD013715, PI: JR Montealegre). Clinical trial number: NCT03898167.

Indexed as

COVID-19Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMalePandemicsPapillomaviridaeSpecimen Handlingbarriers to careepidemiologyglobal healthHPV self-samplinghumanhuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID37232493
PMCPMC10335828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.