Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37232479›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2023

Trends in Positive Surgical Margins in cT3-T4 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Kavita Prasad, Michael C Topf, Stephanie Clookey, Ramez Philips, Joseph Curry, Patrick Tassone

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-4 N0M0 Head and Neck Spindle Cell Carcinoma.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Enhanced Communication of Tumor Margins Using 3D Scanning and Mapping.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kavita PrasadDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-4520
Michael C TopfDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-4417
Stephanie ClookeyUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Ramez PhilipsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-6678
Joseph CurryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-4237
Patrick TassoneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8633-2126
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Missouri · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Vanderbilt Training of Otolaryngology Physician Scientists (V-TOPS) ProgramR25DC020728 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Alexander Gelbard · 2023 to 2026
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NIDCD NIH HHS R25 DC020728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePositive surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma are associated with cost escalation, treatment intensification, and greater risk of recurrence and mortality. The positive margin rate has been decreasing for cT1-T2 oral cavity cancer over the past 2 decades. We aim to evaluate positive margin rates in cT3-T4 oral cavity cancer over time, and determine factors associated with positive margins. STUDY

designRetrospective analysis of a national database.

settingNational Cancer Database 2004 to 2018.

methodsAll adult patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 who underwent primary curative intent surgery for previously untreated cT3-T4 oral cavity cancer with known margin status were included. Logistic univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with positive margins.

resultsAmong 16,326 patients with cT3 or cT4 oral cavity cancer, positive margins were documented in 2932 patients (18.1%). Later year of treatment was not significantly associated with positive margins (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.00). The proportion of patients treated at academic centers increased over time (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03). On multivariable analysis, positive margins were significantly associated with hard palate primary, cT4 tumors, advancing N stage, lymphovascular invasion, poorly differentiated histology, and treatment at nonacademic or low-volume centers.

conclusionDespite increased treatment at academic centers for locally advanced oral cavity cancer, there has been no significant decrease in positive margin rates which remains high at 18.1%. Novel techniques for margin planning and assessment may be required to decrease positive margin rates in locally advanced oral cavity cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsAdultHumansMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckHead and Neck OncologyNational Cancer Databaseoral cavitypositive surgical marginsquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37232479
PMCPMC11563581
OpenAlexW4378349173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.