Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37232213›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2023

Nondestructive 3D pathology with analysis of nuclear features for prostate cancer risk assessment.

Robert Serafin, Can Koyuncu, Weisi Xie, Hongyi Huang, Adam K Glaser, Nicholas P Reder, Andrew Janowczyk, Lawrence D True, Anant Madabhushi, Jonathan Tc Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the Effects of a 3-Dimensional (3D) Pathology Tissue-Processing Workflow on Downstream Molecular Analyses.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Prototype-based AI triage for 3D pathology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Engineering the future of 3D pathology.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2024
    Article
  20. An end-to-end workflow for non-destructive 3D pathology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert SerafinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6646-353X
Can KoyuncuWallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-2226
Weisi XieDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-9583
Hongyi HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adam K GlaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicholas P RederDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew JanowczykWallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lawrence D TrueDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anant MadabhushiWallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-0399
Jonathan Tc LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-3086

Funding

TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETER S NELSON · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
KPMP Kidney Mapping and Atlas Project (KMAP)U01DK133090 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jonathan Himmelfarb, Matthias Kretzler · 2022 to 2026
$10.4M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Pathology CoreU54CA254566 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2020 to 2024
$5.0M
Computational Pathology of Proteinuric DiseasesR01DK118431 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARISONI, LAURA MARIACHIARA, HODGIN, JEFFREY BENTON · 2018 to 2025
$3.6M
Computer-Assisted Histologic Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft RejectionR01HL151277 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
Oral Cavity Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (OHbIC) in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OC-SCC)R01CA249992 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, JAMES, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Prostate cancer risk stratification via computational 3D pathologyR01CA268207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jonathan T.C. Liu, Anant Madabhushi · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
BLRD VA I01 BX004121BLRD VA IK6 BX006185NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NCI NIH HHS K99 CA240681NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249992NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257612NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268207NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248226NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCI NIH HHS U54 CA254566NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151277NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031002NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB028736NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118431NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK133090NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer treatment decisions rely heavily on subjective visual interpretation [assigning Gleason patterns or International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups] of limited numbers of two-dimensional (2D) histology sections. Under this paradigm, interobserver variance is high, with ISUP grades not correlating well with outcome for individual patients, and this contributes to the over- and undertreatment of patients. Recent studies have demonstrated improved prognostication of prostate cancer outcomes based on computational analyses of glands and nuclei within 2D whole slide images. Our group has also shown that the computational analysis of three-dimensional (3D) glandular features, extracted from 3D pathology datasets of whole intact biopsies, can allow for improved recurrence prediction compared to corresponding 2D features. Here we seek to expand on these prior studies by exploring the prognostic value of 3D shape-based nuclear features in prostate cancer (e.g. nuclear size, sphericity). 3D pathology datasets were generated using open-top light-sheet (OTLS) microscopy of 102 cancer-containing biopsies extracted ex vivo from the prostatectomy specimens of 46 patients. A deep learning-based workflow was developed for 3D nuclear segmentation within the glandular epithelium versus stromal regions of the biopsies. 3D shape-based nuclear features were extracted, and a nested cross-validation scheme was used to train a supervised machine classifier based on 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) outcomes. Nuclear features of the glandular epithelium were found to be more prognostic than stromal cell nuclear features (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.72 versus 0.63). 3D shape-based nuclear features of the glandular epithelium were also more strongly associated with the risk of BCR than analogous 2D features (AUC = 0.72 versus 0.62). The results of this preliminary investigation suggest that 3D shape-based nuclear features are associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and could be of value for the development of decision-support tools. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstatectomyRisk Assessment3D segmentationdigital pathologylight-sheet microscopynondestructive 3D pathologyprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37232213
PMCPMC10524574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.