Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37232024›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on female sexual function: A systematic review protocol and meta-analysis.

Carlos Saus-Ortega, Ester Sierra-Garcia, Antonio Martínez-Sabater, Elena Chover-Sierra, María Luisa Ballestar-Tarín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos Saus-OrtegaNursing School La Fe, Adscript Centre to the University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4972-8559
Ester Sierra-GarciaUniversity and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9126-6522
Antonio Martínez-SabaterNursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-1431
Elena Chover-SierraNursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-6956
María Luisa Ballestar-TarínNursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-2956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo recognize, appraise and summarize the research evidence that has explored the results of pelvic floor muscle training on female sexual function.

designSystematic review and possible meta-analysis. METHODOLOGY: Between September and October 2022, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Scopus electronic databases will be searched. We will include RCT's in English, Spanish and Portuguese that investigate the results of pelvic floor muscle training on female sexual function. The data will be extracted by two researchers independently. Risk of bias will be measured from the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis of the results will be performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.

resultsThis systematic review and possible meta-analysis will contribute significantly to the promotion of pelvic floor health and women's sexual function and to strengthen clinical practice and define other areas of study.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topicfemalemeta-analysismidwivesnursespelvic floorphysiologicalpsychologicalsexual dysfunctionsexual dysfunctionssystematic reviewwomen

Identifiers

PMID37232024
PMCPMC10416017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.