ArticleActa haematologica2023
Utility of Galactomannan Screening for Early Detection of Invasive Aspergillosis in High-Risk Hemato-Oncology Patients.
Article in Acta haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory Diagnostics of Aspergillosis: Present State and Future Directions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInvasive aspergillosis (IA) affects mainly patients with hematological malignancies, and early diagnosis is crucial for timely treatment. Most diagnoses are based on clinical and mycological criteria, mostly galactomannan (GM) test in serum or bronchoalveolar fluid, which is performed in case of clinical suspicion or as routine screening in patients at high risk who are not receiving anti-mold prophylaxis, for early detection of IA. The aim of this study was to assess in a real-world setting the efficacy of biweekly serum GM screening for the early detection of IA.
methodsA retrospective cohort that included 80 adult patients treated at the Hematology Department, Hadassah Medical Center, 2016-2020, with a diagnosis of IA. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from patients' medical files and the rate of GM-driven, GM-associated, and non-GM-associated IA was calculated.
resultsThere were 58 patients with IA. The rate of GM-driven diagnosis was 6.9%, GM-associated diagnosis was 43.1%, and non-GM-associated diagnosis was 56.9%. The GM test as a screening tool had led to IA diagnosis in only 0.2% of screened serums with a number needed to screen in order to find 1 patient with IA of 490.
conclusionClinical suspicion outweighs GM screening as a tool for early diagnosis of IA. Nevertheless, GM has an important role as a diagnostic tool for IA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.