ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2023
Pressure-dependent growth controls 3D architecture of Pseudomonas putida microcolonies.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the computing power of microbes that shapes the environment.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- Pressure-dependent growth controls 3D architecture of Pseudomonas putida microcolonies.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Colony formation is key to many ecological and biotechnological processes. In its early stages, colony formation involves the concourse of a number of physical and biological parameters for generation of a distinct 3D structure-the specific influence of which remains unclear. We focused on a thus far neglected aspect of the process, specifically the consequences of the differential pressure experienced by cells in the middle of a colony versus that endured by bacteria located in the growing periphery. This feature was characterized experimentally in the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida. Using an agent-based model we recreated the growth of microcolonies in a scenario in which pressure was the only parameter affecting proliferation of cells. Simulations exposed that, due to constant collisions with other growing bacteria, cells have virtually no free space to move sideways, thereby delaying growth and boosting chances of overlapping on top of each other. This scenario was tested experimentally on agar surfaces. Comparison between experiments and simulations suggested that the inside/outside differential pressure determines growth, both timewise and in terms of spatial directions, eventually moulding colony shape. We thus argue that-at least in the case studied-mere physical pressure of growing cells suffices to explain key dynamics of colony formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.