Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231492›Full record

SynthesisArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2023

Whole genome sequencing diagnostic yield for paediatric patients with suspected genetic disorders: systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.

Mario Cesare Nurchis, Gerardo Altamura, Maria Teresa Riccardi, Francesca Clementina Radio, Giovanni Chillemi, Enrico Silvio Bertini, Jacopo Garlasco, Marco Tartaglia, Bruno Dallapiccola, Gianfranco Damiani

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mario Cesare NurchisDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Gerardo AltamuraDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. gerardoaltamura@outlook.it.
Maria Teresa RiccardiDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Clementina RadioGenetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ChillemiDepartment for Innovation in Biological Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Enrico Silvio BertiniGenetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146, Rome, Italy.
Jacopo GarlascoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marco TartagliaGenetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146, Rome, Italy.
Bruno Dallapiccola *Genetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco Damiani *Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute RF-2018-12,366,391, 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 80% of the roughly 7,000 known rare diseases are single gene disorders, about 85% of which are ultra-rare, affecting less than one in one million individuals. NGS technologies, in particular whole genome sequencing (WGS) in paediatric patients suffering from severe disorders of likely genetic origin improve the diagnostic yield allowing targeted, effective care and management. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of WGS, with respect to whole exome sequencing (WES) and/or usual care, for the diagnosis of suspected genetic disorders among the paediatric population.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted querying relevant electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2010 to June 2022. A random-effect meta-analysis was run to inspect the diagnostic yield of different techniques. A network meta-analysis was also performed to directly assess the comparison between WGS and WES.

resultsOf the 4,927 initially retrieved articles, thirty-nine met the inclusion criteria. Overall results highlighted a significantly higher pooled diagnostic yield for WGS, 38.6% (95% CI: [32.6 - 45.0]), in respect to WES, 37.8% (95% CI: [32.9 - 42.9]) and usual care, 7.8% (95% CI: [4.4 - 13.2]). The meta-regression output suggested a higher diagnostic yield of the WGS compared to WES after controlling for the type of disease (monogenic vs non-monogenic), with a tendency to better diagnostic performances for Mendelian diseases. The network meta-analysis showed a higher diagnostic yield for WGS compared to WES (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: [1.11 - 2.12]).

conclusionsAlthough whole genome sequencing for the paediatric population with suspected genetic disorders provided an accurate and early genetic diagnosis in a high proportion of cases, further research is needed for evaluating costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of WGS and achieving an informed decision-making process.

trial registrationThis systematic review has not been registered.

Indexed as

Diagnostic yieldHealth policyNGSPaediatricsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37231492
PMCPMC10210272
OpenAlexW4378219751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.