ArticleBMC oral health2023
New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fixture design effects on posterior dental implant stability using finite element analysis (FEA): a systematic review.Head & face medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of topical vitamin D application on immediate dental implants: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Primary stability of dental implants placed in low-density polyurethane blocks: Undersized osteotomy versus osseodensification, an in vitro comparative study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Tridimensional Analysis of Maxillary Teeth Movements in Premolar-Extraction Cases Treated With Clear Aligners.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Expanded classification for immediate molar implant placement: Integrating root socket strategies beyond septal bone typing.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of early trabecular changes around implants using fractal analysis and panoramic indices.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of bone density after implant placement with and without bone grafting using CBCT.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Effect of distal cantilever and anterior implant diameter on framework and cortical bone stress in a PEEK-based All-on-Four mandibular prosthesis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Bone Stresses for Implant Inclinations of 0°, 15°, and 20°.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accuracy of the Hounsfield Unit Values Measured by Implant Planning Software.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Automatic jawbone structure segmentation on dental CBCT images via deep learning.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Comparative Histological Analysis of Dentine-Derived Tooth Grafts in Maxillary vs Mandibular Socket Preservation: A Retrospective Study of 178 Cases.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- The Value of Mandibular Indices on Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Secondary Causes of Low Bone Mass.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Association of Systemic and Mandibular Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Females with Osteoporosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Preoperative assessment of bone density for dental implantation: a comparative study of three different ROI methods.Head & face medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study proposed a new classification method of bone quantity and quality at the dental implant site using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analysis, classifying cortical and cancellous bones separately and using CBCT for quantitative analysis.
methodsPreoperative CBCT images were obtained from 128 implant patients (315 sites). First, measure the crestal cortical bone thickness (in mm) and the cancellous bone density [in grayscale values (GV) and bone mineral density (g/cm
resultsThe results of the nine bone type proportions based on the new jawbone classification were as follows: A1 (8.57%,27/315), A2 (13.02%), A3 (4.13%), B1 (17.78%), B2 (20.63%), B3 (8.57%) C1 (4.44%), C2 (14.29%), and C3 (8.57%).
conclusionsThe proposed classification can complement the parts overlooked in previous bone classification methods (bone types A3 and C1).
trial registrationThe retrospective registration of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH 108-REC2-181.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.