Trial reportBMC surgery2023
A comparison of coblation and modified monopolar tonsillectomy in adults.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Post-Operative Oral Intake Following Tonsillectomy in Children with OSA.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life and functional recovery outcomes following tonsillectomy among patients in Hail, Saudi Arabia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the intraoperative records and postoperative clinical outcomes of adults who underwent coblation and modified monopolar tonsillectomy tonsillectomies. MATERIALS AND
methodsAdult patients with tonsillectomy were randomly divided into the coblation and modified monopolar tonsillectomy groups. The estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, operation time, post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH), and cost of disposable equipment were compared.
resultsPain intensity in the coblation and monopolar groups was similar on postoperative days 3 and 7. However, the mean maximum pain score in the monopolar group was significantly higher compared to the coblation group on postoperative days 1 (P < 0.01) and 2 (P < 0.05).Secondary PTH occurred in 7.1% (23/326) of patients in the coblation group and 2.8% (9/327) of patients in the monopolar group (P < 0.05).
conclusionAlthough pain was significantly increased on postoperative days 1 and 2 in the modified monopolar tonsillectomy group, the operation time, secondary PTH, and medical costs were significantly decreased compared to the coblation technique group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.