ArticleBehavior research methods2024
Alternative covariance structures in mixed-effects models: Addressing intra- and inter-individual heterogeneity.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Stability, Reproducibility and Predictability of Whole-Body Sweat Sodium Concentration During Prolonged Cycling in the Heat withNutrients · 2026Trial
- Genetic marker analysis of RAPGEF6 gene and covariance structure modelling for egg.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Validity of the CORE Wearable Sensor During Internal Cooling Induced by Hyperhydration with Cold Water at Rest.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the impact of Chinese medicine on CD4 cell counts in people living with HIV by mixed-effects model: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Root microbiome dynamics favor slow-growth strategies duringISME communications · 2026Article
- Dynamic Changes in Peripheral Immune Cells During Efgartigimod Treatment in Naive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Community-level determinants of loneliness and social isolation: a population-based cohort study across younger and older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Online Fitness Content as a behavioral catalyst: extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to unmask time-dependent effects on resistance training engagement.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed-effects models for repeated measures and longitudinal data include random coefficients that are unique to the individual, and thus permit subject-specific growth trajectories, as well as direct study of how the coefficients of a growth function vary as a function of covariates. Although applications of these models often assume homogeneity of the within-subject residual variance that characterizes within-person variation after accounting for systematic change and the variances of the random coefficients of a growth model that quantify individual differences in aspects of change, alternative covariance structures can be considered. These include allowing for serial correlations between the within-subject residuals to account for dependencies in data that remain after fitting a particular growth model or specifying the within-subject residual variance to be a function of covariates or a random subject effect to address between-subject heterogeneity due to unmeasured influences. Further, the variances of the random coefficients can be functions of covariates to relax the assumption that these variances are constant across subjects and to allow for the study of determinants of these sources of variation. In this paper, we consider combinations of these structures that permit flexibility in how mixed-effects models are specified to understand within- and between-subject variation in repeated measures and longitudinal data. Data from three learning studies are analyzed using these different specifications of mixed-effects models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.