Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231323›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025

Pilot Study of Self-Distancing Augmentation to Exposure Therapy for Youth Anxiety.

Emily L Bilek, Allison E Meyer, Rachel Tomlinson, Carol Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily L BilekDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Rd., SPC 5765, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ealaird@med.umich.edu.
Allison E MeyerDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rachel TomlinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carol ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Rd., SPC 5765, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Michigan · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot examines a self-distancing augmentation to exposure. Nine youth with anxiety (ages 11-17; 67% female) completed treatment. The study employed a brief (eight session) crossover ABA/BAB design. Exposure difficulty, engagement with exposure, and treatment acceptability were examined as primary outcome variables. Visual inspection of plots indicated that youth completed more difficult exposures during augmented exposure sessions [EXSD] than classic exposure sessions [EX] by therapist- and youth-report and that therapists reported higher youth engagement during EXSD than EX sessions. There were no significant differences between EXSD and EX on exposure difficulty or engagement by therapist- or youth-report. Treatment acceptability was high, although some youth reported that self-distancing was "awkward". Self-distancing may be associated with increased exposure engagement and willingness to complete more difficult exposures, which has been linked to treatment outcomes. Future research is needed to further demonstrate this link, and link self-distancing to outcomes directly.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersImplosive TherapyAdolescentChildCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAnxiety disordersCognitive behavioral therapyExposure therapySelf-distancingYouth

Identifiers

PMID37231323
PMCPMC10212740
OpenAlexW4378348652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.