ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
A Robust and Explainable Structure-Based Algorithm for Detecting the Organ Boundary From Ultrasound Multi-Datasets.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localizing Knee Pain via Explainable Bayesian Generative Models and Counterfactual MRI: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Dual-Modality Dual-View Hybrid Deep Learning-Machine Learning Framework for the Prediction of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability via Late Fusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting the organ boundary in an ultrasound image is challenging because of the poor contrast of ultrasound images and the existence of imaging artifacts. In this study, we developed a coarse-to-refinement architecture for multi-organ ultrasound segmentation. First, we integrated the principal curve-based projection stage into an improved neutrosophic mean shift-based algorithm to acquire the data sequence, for which we utilized a limited amount of prior seed point information as the approximate initialization. Second, a distribution-based evolution technique was designed to aid in the identification of a suitable learning network. Then, utilizing the data sequence as the input of the learning network, we achieved the optimal learning network after learning network training. Finally, a scaled exponential linear unit-based interpretable mathematical model of the organ boundary was expressed via the parameters of a fraction-based learning network. The experimental outcomes indicated that our algorithm 1) achieved more satisfactory segmentation outcomes than state-of-the-art algorithms, with a Dice score coefficient value of 96.68 ± 2.2%, a Jaccard index value of 95.65 ± 2.16%, and an accuracy of 96.54 ± 1.82% and 2) discovered missing or blurry areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.