Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231259›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2024

Phage-inclusive profiling of human gut microbiomes with Phanta.

Yishay Pinto, Meenakshi Chakraborty, Navami Jain, Ami S Bhatt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Remodelling of the gut virome after long-term fasting.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yishay Pinto *Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Meenakshi Chakraborty *Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-7219
Navami JainDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ami S BhattDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. asbhatt@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-2975

Funding

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation n/aEIF | Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) n/aSU | School of Medicine, Stanford University (Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University) Dean's FellowshipU.S. Department of Defense (United States Department of Defense) NDSEG fellowshipU.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1S10OD02014101U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 5T32HG000044-25U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01AI14375702U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01AI14862302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to technical limitations, most gut microbiome studies have focused on prokaryotes, overlooking viruses. Phanta, a virome-inclusive gut microbiome profiling tool, overcomes the limitations of assembly-based viral profiling methods by using customized k-mer-based classification tools and incorporating recently published catalogs of gut viral genomes. Phanta's optimizations consider the small genome size of viruses, sequence homology with prokaryotes and interactions with other gut microbes. Extensive testing of Phanta on simulated data demonstrates that it quickly and accurately quantifies prokaryotes and viruses. When applied to 245 fecal metagenomes from healthy adults, Phanta identifies ~200 viral species per sample, ~5× more than standard assembly-based methods. We observe a ~2:1 ratio between DNA viruses and bacteria, with higher interindividual variability of the gut virome compared to the gut bacteriome. In another cohort, we observe that Phanta performs equally well on bulk versus virus-enriched metagenomes, making it possible to study prokaryotes and viruses in a single experiment, with a single analysis.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaVirusesAdultDNA VirusesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.