Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231202›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Concept-based reasoning in medical imaging.

Anuja Vats, Marius Pedersen, Ahmed Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anuja VatsDepartment of Computer Science, NTNU, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway. anuja.vats@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9042-2367
Marius PedersenDepartment of Computer Science, NTNU, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway.
Ahmed MohammedDepartment of Computer Science, NTNU, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 300031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs concept-based reasoning for improving model interpretability becomes promising, the question of how to define good concepts becomes more pertinent. In domains like medical, it is not always feasible to access instances clearly representing good concepts. In this work, we propose an approach to use organically mined concepts from unlabeled data to explain classifier predictions.

methodsA Concept Mapping Module (CMM) is central to this approach. Given a capsule endoscopy image predicted as abnormal, the CMM's main task is to identify which concept explains the abnormality. It consists of two parts, namely a convolutional encoder and a similarity block. The encoder maps the incoming image into the latent vector, while the similarity block retrieves the closest aligning concept as explanation.

resultsAbnormal images can be explained in terms of five pathology-related concepts retrieved from the latent space given by inflammation (mild and severe), vascularity, ulcer and polyp. Other non-pathological concepts found include anatomy, debris, intestinal fluid and capsule modality.

conclusionsThis method outlines an approach through which concept-based explanations can be generated. Exploiting the latent space of styleGAN to look for variations and using task-relevant variations for defining concepts is a powerful way through which an initial concept dictionary can be created which can subsequently be iteratively refined with much less time and resource.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingHumansRadiographyBiomedical imagingCapsule endoscopyDeep learningInterpretability

Identifiers

PMID37231202
PMCPMC10329620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.