ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Concept-based reasoning in medical imaging.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming the Black Box Challenge: Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Oncology.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAs concept-based reasoning for improving model interpretability becomes promising, the question of how to define good concepts becomes more pertinent. In domains like medical, it is not always feasible to access instances clearly representing good concepts. In this work, we propose an approach to use organically mined concepts from unlabeled data to explain classifier predictions.
methodsA Concept Mapping Module (CMM) is central to this approach. Given a capsule endoscopy image predicted as abnormal, the CMM's main task is to identify which concept explains the abnormality. It consists of two parts, namely a convolutional encoder and a similarity block. The encoder maps the incoming image into the latent vector, while the similarity block retrieves the closest aligning concept as explanation.
resultsAbnormal images can be explained in terms of five pathology-related concepts retrieved from the latent space given by inflammation (mild and severe), vascularity, ulcer and polyp. Other non-pathological concepts found include anatomy, debris, intestinal fluid and capsule modality.
conclusionsThis method outlines an approach through which concept-based explanations can be generated. Exploiting the latent space of styleGAN to look for variations and using task-relevant variations for defining concepts is a powerful way through which an initial concept dictionary can be created which can subsequently be iteratively refined with much less time and resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.