Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231157›Full record

ArticleHeredity2023

Multibreed genomic prediction using summary statistics and a breed-origin-of-alleles approach.

J B Clasen, W F Fikse, G Su, E Karaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic analysis of breed composition and population structure in Montana composite cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Indirect Genomic Predictions for Indicine Cattle Breeds With SNP Effects From a Multi-Breed Genomic Evaluation.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J B ClasenDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. julie.clasen@qgg.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-5400
W F FikseVäxa Sverige, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 26, 756 51, Uppsala, Sweden.
G SuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
E KaramanCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-683X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of an increasing interest in crossbreeding between dairy breeds in dairy cattle herds, farmers are requesting breeding values for crossbred animals. However, genomically enhanced breeding values are difficult to predict in crossbred populations because the genetic make-up of crossbred individuals is unlikely to follow the same pattern as for purebreds. Furthermore, sharing genotype and phenotype information between breed populations are not always possible, which means that genetic merit (GM) for crossbred animals may be predicted without the information needed from some pure breeds, resulting in low prediction accuracy. This simulation study investigated the consequences of using summary statistics from single-breed genomic predictions for some or all pure breeds in two- and three-breed rotational crosses, rather than their raw data. A genomic prediction model taking into account the breed-origin of alleles (BOA) was considered. Because of a high genomic correlation between the breeds simulated (0.62-0.87), the prediction accuracies using the BOA approach were similar to a joint model, assuming homogeneous SNP effects for these breeds. Having a reference population with summary statistics available from all pure breeds and full phenotype and genotype information from crossbreds yielded almost as high prediction accuracies (0.720-0.768) as having a reference population with full information from all pure breeds and crossbreds (0.753-0.789). Lacking information from the pure breeds yielded much lower prediction accuracies (0.590-0.676). Furthermore, including crossbred animals in a combined reference population also benefitted prediction accuracies in the purebred animals, especially for the smallest breed population.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesAnimalsCattleGenomicsGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37231157
PMCPMC10313778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.