Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37231139›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2023

Comparing the efficacy of oral labetalol with oral amlodipine in achieving blood pressure control in women with postpartum hypertension: randomized controlled trial (HIPPO study-Hypertension In Pregnancy & Postpartum Oral-antihypertensive therapy).

Avantika Gupta, Deepthi Nayak, Jyotsna Sharma, Anish Keepanasseril

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Avantika GuptaDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Deepthi NayakDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Jyotsna SharmaDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Anish KeepanasserilDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India. keepan_r@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-0382
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo - or as a continuum of antenatal hypertension -postpartum hypertension complicates ~2% of pregnancies. Many maternal complications, such as eclampsia and cerebrovascular accidents, occur in the postpartum period. Despite widespread use of antihypertensives during pregnancy and childbirth, there is a paucity of data on preferred medications in the postpartum period. This randomized controlled study enrolled 130 women who were started on antihypertensives. They were randomized to receive oral Labetalol(LAB, maximum 900 mg per day in three doses) or oral Amlodipine(AML, maximum 10 mg per day given in two doses). In the immediate postpartum, all women were closely monitored for neurological symptoms, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, urine output, and deep tendon reflex. The primary outcome was the time to achieve sustained blood pressure control for 12 h from the initiation of medication; secondary outcomes included side effects of both medications. Mean time to achieve sustained blood pressure control was lower in women who received AML than in those who received LAB-(mean difference 7.2 h; 38 95% CI 1.4, 12.9, p = 0.011). There were fewer severe hypertensive episodes among those with AML than in those who received LAB. However, the proportion of women who continued to require antihypertensives at discharge was higher in the AML group than in the LAB group (55.4% versus 32.3%, p = 0.008). None of the participants developed drug-related side effects. Among women with postpartum persistence or new-onset hypertension, oral AML achieved sustained blood pressure control in a shorter duration, with fewer hypertensive emergencies than oral LAB. (CTRI/2020/02/023236).Trial Registration details: The study protocol was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India with CTRI Number CTRI/2020/02/023236 dated 11.02.2020. Protocol can be accessed at https://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pdf_generate.php?trialid=40435&EncHid=&modid=&compid=%27,%2740435det%27 .

Indexed as

HypertensionLabetalolLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsLabetalol

Identifiers

PMID37231139
OpenAlexW4378220383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.