ArticleScientific reports2023
A network meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of various radical and conservative surgical approaches regarding recurrence in treating solid/multicystic ameloblastomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Recurrence of Glandular Odontogenic Cysts: A Systematic Review.Head and neck pathology · 2024Pooled it
- Bone-Morphology (BM) classification: a novel staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma, a multicenter retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Peripheral Ameloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Effect of Conservative vs. Radical Treatment of Ameloblastoma on Recurrence Rate and Quality of Life: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Association of MDM2 Overexpression in Ameloblastomas withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple treatment approaches have been undertaken to reduce the incidence of recurrence in solid/multicystic ameloblastoma (SMA), both conservative and radical. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess and compare the effectiveness of these various treatment approaches concurrently. This study was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA) statement. PubMed (MEDLINE), ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until August 10, 2021. The NMA was conducted using the STATA program. Of 1153 records identified in the search, seven observational studies with 180 patients were included. Six different treatment approaches were identified. Segmental resection ranked highest for reducing the recurrence rate with the highest SUCRA score (77.7), followed by curettage with cryotherapy (66.9) and marginal resection (49.3). Network inconsistencies and publication bias appeared to be absent. According to the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMa) method, the evidence's certainty was low for all comparisons due to imprecision and within-study bias. In conclusion, this study is the first NMA in the field of ameloblastoma. Segmental resection seemed to be the most effective treatment approach for minimizing recurrence in SMA patients. Nevertheless, weak certainty of evidence makes that the results must be regarded with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.