Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37230759›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2023

Visual identifiers for people with dementia in hospitals: a qualitative study to unravel mechanisms of action for improving quality of care.

Elizabeth Sutton, Natalie Armstrong, Louise Locock, Simon Conroy, Carolyn Tarrant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth SuttonHealth Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK es225@le.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-6287
Natalie ArmstrongHealth Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-0119
Louise LocockHSRU, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-1930
Simon ConroyMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4306-6064
Carolyn TarrantHealth Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-5342

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalised people with dementia (PwD) experience worse care and more patient safety incidents than non-dementia patients. Visual identifiers are commonly used to identify patients who have a diagnosis of dementia, with the aim of promoting more personalised care. However, little is known about how they work in practice, nor about the potential unintended consequences that might arise from their use. We aim to identify the mechanisms through which visual identifiers could support good care for PwD, how and why their use may have negative consequences and the conditions for their effective use.

methodsWe conducted interviews with 21 dementia leads and healthcare professionals, 19 carers and two PwD, and produced case studies of visual identification systems in four UK acute hospital trusts between 2019 and 2021. Analysis drew on the concept of classification to identify and explore mechanisms of action.

resultsWe identified four mechanisms through which visual identifiers could help towards providing good care for PwD: enabling coordination of care at organisational level; signalling eligibility for dementia-specific interventions; informing prioritisation of resources on wards; and acting as a quick reference cue for staff. But identifier effectiveness could be undermined by: lack of standardisation and consistency; a lack of closely coupled information about individual needs; and stigma associated with a dementia diagnosis. Identifier effectiveness was dependent on their implementation being supported through staff training, resources directed and efforts to develop a supportive culture for caring for this patient group.

conclusionOur research highlights the potential mechanisms of action of visual identifiers and their possible negative consequences. Optimising the use of identifiers requires consensus on the rules of classification and the symbols used, and closely coupled patient information. Organisations need to provide support, offer the right resources and training and engage meaningfully with carers and patients about the use of identifiers.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHospitalsCaregiversHumansQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareHealthcare quality improvementHealth services researchQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37230759
PMCPMC10511993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.