ArticleMethods in enzymology2023
Optimizing purification and activity assays of N-terminal methyltransferase complexes.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro methyltransferase assays have traditionally been carried out with tritiated S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor, as site-specific methylation antibodies are not always available for Western or dot blots and structural requirements of many methyltransferases prohibit the use of peptide substrates in luminescent or colorimetric assays. The discovery of the first N-terminal methyltransferase, METTL11A, has allowed for a second look at non-radioactive in vitro methyltransferase assays, as N-terminal methylation is amenable to antibody production and the limited structural requirements of METTL11A allow for its methylation of peptide substrates. We have used a combination of Western blots and luminescent assays to verify substrates of METTL11A and the two other known N-terminal methyltransferases, METTL11B and METTL13. We have also developed these assays for use beyond substrate identification, showing that METTL11A activity is opposingly regulated by METTL11B and METTL13. Here we provide two methods for non-radioactive characterization of N-terminal methylation, Western blots with full-length recombinant protein substrates and luminescent assays with peptide substrates, and describe how each can be additionally adapted to look at regulatory complexes. We will review the advantages and disadvantages of each method in context with the other types of in vitro methyltransferase assays and discuss why these types of assays could be of general use to the N-terminal modification field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.