ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2023
Multicenter Evaluation of Frequency and Impact of Activity Infiltration in PET Imaging, Including Microscale Modeling of Skin-Absorbed Dose.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual radiopharmaceutical activity in venous access devices during PET and SPECT imaging: a real-world clinical observational cohort study.EJNMMI reports · 2026Article
- Extravasation Frequency of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Response to "Critique and Discussion of 'Multicenter Evaluation of Frequency and Impact of Activity Infiltration in PET Imaging, Including Microscale Modeling of Skin-Absorbed Dose'".Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Critique and discussion of "Multicenter evaluation of frequency and impact of activity infiltration in PET imaging, including microscale modeling of skin-absorbed dose".Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2023
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been significant recent interest in understanding both the frequency of nuclear medicine injection infiltration and the potential for negative impact, including skin injury. However, no large-scale study has yet correlated visualized injection site activity with actual activity measurement of an infiltrate. Additionally, current skin dosimetry approaches lack sufficient detail to account for critical factors that impact the dose to the radiosensitive epidermis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.