Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229387›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

How to measure staff continuity in intensive psychiatric home treatment: a routine data and single case analysis.

Julian Schwarz, Jan Wolff, Martin Heinze, Sebastian von Peter, Juri Luis Habicht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julian SchwarzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Jan WolffPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Martin HeinzeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Sebastian von PeterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Juri Luis HabichtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intensive forms of outreach mental health care (IOC) such as crisis resolution or home treatment teams are increasingly implemented as alternatives to inpatient admission, providing recovery-oriented treatment at home at comparable costs and outcomes. However, one issue with IOC is the lack of continuity regarding staff members who provide home visits, complicating relationship building and meaningful therapeutic exchange. The aim of this study is to validate existing primarily qualitative findings using performance data and to explore a possible correlation between the number of staff involved within IOC treatment and the service users' length of stay (LOS). Methods: Routine data from an IOC team in a catchment area in Eastern Germany were analyzed. Basic parameters of service delivery were calculated and an in-depth descriptive analysis regarding staff continuity was performed. Further, an exploratory single case analysis was conducted, presenting the exact sequence of all treatment contacts for one case with low and one with high staff continuity. Results: We analyzed 10.598 face-to-face treatment contacts based on 178 IOC users. The mean LOS was 30.99 days. About 75% of all home visits were conducted by two or more staff members simultaneously. Service users saw an average of 10.24 different staff per treatment episode. On 11% of the care days, only unknown staff, and on 34% of the care days at least one unknown staff member conducted the home visit. 83% of the contacts were performed by the same three staff members and 51% were made by one and the same staff member. A significant positive correlation ( Conclusion: Our results suggest that a high number of different staff in the early period of IOC episodes correlates with an extended LOS. Future research must clarify the exact mechanisms of this correlation. Furthermore, it should be investigated how the multiple professions within IOC teams influence the LOS and the quality of treatment and what quality indicators may be suitable to ensure treatment processes.

Indexed as

assertive community treatmentcommunity mental health carecontinuity of carecrisis resolution teamsStäBStationsäquivalente Behandlung

Identifiers

PMID37229387
PMCPMC10204706
OpenAlexW4378348668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.