Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229308›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2023

Gynaecology, general surgery and urology residents' perspective and exposure to endoscopy training and practice: a cross-sectional study of resident doctors in four residency training centres in Abuja, Nigeria from June to August, 2020.

Azuka Chinweokwu Ezeike, Toochi Oliver Nwoye, Oladele Olasunkanmi Situ, David Tolulope Ejenobo, Febian Ehimatie Obakeye, Augustine Monday Onuh, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Ikechebelu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Azuka Chinweokwu EzeikeObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Toochi Oliver NwoyeObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Federal Medical Centre Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Oladele Olasunkanmi SituGeneral Surgery Division, Surgery Department, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
David Tolulope EjenoboObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Nisa Premier Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Febian Ehimatie ObakeyeObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Augustine Monday OnuhObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Garki Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Joseph Ifeanyichukwu IkechebeluObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi, Nnewi, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: the use of endoscopy in the surgical management of a wide range of ailments has revolutionised the practice of surgery. Endoscopy however has been underutilised in developing nations. Optimal training exposure during the residency training program is considered as very crucial to the improvement of endoscopy practice in this region. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception and endoscopy training exposure of resident doctors in gynaecology, general surgery and urology in four residency training centres in Abuja. Methods: this was an analytical cross-sectional study of endoscopy exposure of gynaecology, general surgery and urology resident doctors in four residency training centres in Abuja from June through August 2020. Using a structured questionnaire, information was obtained on demography, perception of endoscopy, exposure to and expectations for endoscopy training and practice. Data were analysed with SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: a total of 125 questionnaires were distributed with a 92% response rate. The mean age of the respondents was 36.17±4.62 years with a mean duration of training of 53.91±28.02 months. Eighteen (15.8%) were satisfied with endoscopy practice in their centre and only five respondents (4.4%) had attained competence in operative endoscopy. Twelve trainees (10.5%) reported that they had received formal training in endoscopy outside their workplace and 109 (95.6%) desired to have post-fellowship training. Competence was statistically significantly higher among the senior registrars compared to registrars (Fisher 51.81, P=< 0.001). Lack of funding was the most reported limiting factor to endoscopy training (66.7%) while most (85.1%) desired the incorporation of structured endoscopy training into the residency training curriculum. Conclusion: this study showed poor endoscopy training exposure, a high level of dissatisfaction with the state of endoscopy practice and high expectations of the trainees for improved training facilities and human capacity.

Indexed as

General SurgeryGynecologyInternship and ResidencyUrologyAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansNigeriaSurveys and QuestionnairesEndoscopyexposureresidencytraining

Identifiers

PMID37229308
PMCPMC10204102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.