Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229285›Full record

ReviewPatient related outcome measures2023

Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Clinical Trials in AL Amyloidosis: Report from the Amyloidosis Forum HRQOL Working Group.

Avery A Rizio, Michelle K White, Anita D'Souza, Kristen Hsu, Paula Schmitt, Tiffany P Quock, James Signorovitch, Isabelle Lousada, Vaishali Sanchorawala

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient related outcome measures, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Disease burden of ATTR amyloidosis based on the SF-36Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Avery A RizioQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-4523
Michelle K WhiteQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2450-7693
Anita D'SouzaFroedtert & MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Kristen HsuAmyloidosis Research Consortium, Boston, MA, USA.
Paula SchmittAmyloidosis Support Groups, Inc, Wood Dale, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-658X
Tiffany P QuockProthena Biosciences Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-4285
James SignorovitchEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Isabelle LousadaAmyloidosis Research Consortium, Boston, MA, USA.
Vaishali SanchorawalaAmyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-2445
Amyloidosis Foundation · USAnalysis Group (United States) · USBoston University · USFroedtert Hospital · USProthena (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic AL (light chain) amyloidosis is a rare protein misfolding disorder associated with plasma cell dyscrasia affecting various organs leading to organ dysfunction and failure. The Amyloidosis Forum is a public-private partnership between the Amyloidosis Research Consortium and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research with the goal of accelerating the development of effective treatments for AL amyloidosis. In recognition of this goal, 6 individual working groups were formed to identify and/or provide recommendations related to various aspects of patient-relevant clinical trial endpoints. This review summarizes the methods, findings, and recommendations of the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Working Group. The HRQOL Working Group sought to identify existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments of HRQOL for use in clinical trials and practice deemed relevant across a broad spectrum of patients with AL amyloidosis. A systematic review of the AL amyloidosis literature identified 1) additional signs/symptoms not currently part of an existing conceptual model, and 2) relevant PRO instruments used to measure HRQOL. The Working Group mapped content from each identified instrument to areas of impact in the conceptual model to determine which instrument(s) provide coverage of relevant concepts. The SF-36v2

Indexed as

drug developmentendpointspatient-reported outcomePROMIS-29rare diseasesSF-36v2

Identifiers

PMID37229285
PMCPMC10202704
OpenAlexW4377108013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.