Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229104›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Genomic prediction with haplotype blocks in wheat.

Yohannes Fekadu Difabachew, Matthias Frisch, Anna Luise Langstroff, Andreas Stahl, Benjamin Wittkop, Rod J Snowdon, Michael Koch, Martin Kirchhoff, László Cselényi, Markus Wolf and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mining QTLs and candidate genes in bread wheat associated with kernel hardness through GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring the potential of naked barley to manage deoxynivalenol accumulation from Fusarium head blight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PotatoMASH is a cost-effective marker system for genomic prediction in potato based on short-read haplotypes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yohannes Fekadu DifabachewInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Matthias FrischInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Anna Luise LangstroffInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Andreas StahlInstitute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Julius Kühn Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Benjamin WittkopInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Rod J SnowdonInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Michael KochDeutsche Saatveredelung AG, Lippstadt, Germany.
Martin KirchhoffNordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Langenstein, Germany.
László CselényiDepartment of Cereal Breeding, W. von Borries-Eckendorf GmbH & Co. KG, Leopoldshöhe, Germany.
Markus WolfGerman Seed Alliance GmbH, Holtsee, Germany.
Jutta FörsterSaaten-Union Biotec GmbH, Leopoldshöhe, Germany.
Sven WeberInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Uche Joshua OkoyeInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Carola Zenke-PhilippiInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haplotype blocks might carry additional information compared to single SNPs and have therefore been suggested for use as independent variables in genomic prediction. Studies in different species resulted in more accurate predictions than with single SNPs in some traits but not in others. In addition, it remains unclear how the blocks should be built to obtain the greatest prediction accuracies. Our objective was to compare the results of genomic prediction with different types of haplotype blocks to prediction with single SNPs in 11 traits in winter wheat. We built haplotype blocks from marker data from 361 winter wheat lines based on linkage disequilibrium, fixed SNP numbers, fixed lengths in cM and with the R package HaploBlocker. We used these blocks together with data from single-year field trials in a cross-validation study for predictions with RR-BLUP, an alternative method (RMLA) that allows for heterogeneous marker variances, and GBLUP performed with the software GVCHAP. The greatest prediction accuracies for resistance scores for

Indexed as

cross-validationgenomic predictionhaplotype blocksprediction accuracywheat

Identifiers

PMID37229104
PMCPMC10203549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.