ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Simulation-based perioperative anaesthesia information management practice: cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative anaesthesia record completeness is very essential skill of the anaesthesia profession at the time of operation in the health setting. During perioperative, anaesthesia care sometimes there may be missing important information of the patient, medication taken or planned. This study aimed to improve perioperative anaesthesia information management practice. Methodology: Pre-interventional and post-interventional cross-sectional study was conducted from 21 June to 25 July 2022 on 164 anaesthesia record filled by 51 anaesthesia care provider in pre-interventional and post-interventional phase. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and the data entered by Epi-data software (version 4.6) and analyzed by using SPSS version 26. For all indicators, the projected completion rate was 100%. Indicators with completion rates of greater than 90% were classified as acceptable, while those with completion rates of 50% were seen as urgently needing improvement. Results: Pre-interventional result: among all indicators, none of the indicators had 100%, completeness rate. Postoperative nausea and vomiting management orders, the names of the surgeon and anaesthetist, the location of the intravenous cannula, the maintenance of anaesthesia, the total amount of fluid supplied, the content of the consent discussion, and null per ose status, age, and weight of the patient were some of the markers that were identified below average (50%) and in need of significant improvement. Post-interventional result: when compared with the pre-interventional result, their documentation skills were improving after discussions with stakeholders and the relevant bodies; however, none of the indicators attained 100% completion rate. Conclusion and recommendation: Even after the interventions, the desired completion rate was not attained. As a result, it requires ongoing instruction on perioperative anaesthesia information management according to the standard perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.