Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229040›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Rise of biologics in noninfectious uveitis: a retrospective cohort study from Nepal.

Sadhana Sharma, Ranju Kharel, Sanket Parajuli, Saket Jha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Update on Therapy for Non-Infectious Scleritis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sadhana SharmaB.P. Koirala Lions Center for Ophthalmic Studies (BPKLCOS), Institute of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-6938
Ranju KharelB.P. Koirala Lions Center for Ophthalmic Studies (BPKLCOS), Institute of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-8624-4433
Sanket ParajuliReiyukai Eiko Masunaga Eye Hospital, Banepa, Nepal.
Saket JhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu.
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NPTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveitis is a sight-threatening disease that poses a heavy burden on the quality of life. The treatment of uveitis has been revolutionized in the past two decades. Most remarkable among these is the emergence of biologics, which have shown to be effective and safer therapeutic option in noninfectious uveitis. Biologics are very useful when conventional immunomodulator therapy has failed or has been poorly tolerated. The most widely used biologics are tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (infliximab and adalimumab) with promising results. Other drugs include anti-CD20 inhibitors (rituximab), interleukin-6R-inhibitor (tocilizumab), interleukin-1R-inhibitor (anakinra), and Janus-associated kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib). Methods: A retrospective review of all cases of noninfectious uveitis and scleritis presenting to our center from July 2019 to January 2021 and had been treated with biological therapy were included. Results: We included 12 eyes of 10 patients. The mean age was 42.10±9.71 years. Anterior nongranulomatous uveitis comprised 70% of the cases and the most common etiology of anterior uveitis was spondyloarthritis (seven cases among which five cases were nonradiographic) axial spondyloarthritis (human leukocyte antigen B27 positive) followed by radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (two cases). The first line of treatment in all cases was conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic agents among which 50% (n=5) had received methotrexate (≥15 mg/week). As a second line of treatment, one or more biologics was used. Majority of the patients received oral tofacitinib 50% (n=5) followed by Inj adalimumab 30% (n=3). One case of Behcet's disease required sequential biologics (Inj adalimumab followed by oral tofacitinib). All patients tolerated and responded well to the treatment and no recurrences were observed after discontinuation of biologics drugs during the follow-up period of 1 year. Conclusion: Biologics are a relatively safe and effective modality of treatment in refractory, recurrent noninfectious uveitis.

Indexed as

biologicsnoninfectious uveitisscleritistofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID37229040
PMCPMC10205283
OpenAlexW4366724592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.