ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the prostate: review of the literature and case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with a focus on extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs).Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) is defined as a mesenchymal neoplasm arising from soft tissues outside the gastrointestinal tract, and the prostate is a rare presentation site. Case presentation: A 58-year-old man was presented with lower urinary tract symptoms for 6 months. A digital rectal examination revealed a markedly enlarged prostate with a smooth, bulging surface. Prostate-specific antigen density was 0.5 ng/ml. MRI of the prostate showed an enlarged prostatic mass with hemorrhagic necrosis. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was performed and pathological reports suggested a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The patient refused radical prostatectomy and received only imatinib treatment. Clinical discussion: The diagnosis of EGIST of the prostate is extremely rare and depends on the histopathologic features with immunohistochemical results. The treatment is essentially based on radical prostatectomy, but there are other therapeutic modalities associating surgery with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients refusing surgery, treatment with imatinib alone appears to be a therapeutic solution. Conclusion: Despite the rarity, EGIST of the prostate should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. There is no consensus regarding the treatment of EGIST, and the patients are treated as per the risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.