ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Twenty-year experience in liver surgery in metastatic colorectal patients: a case series study in Ukraine.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic versus open minor liver resections of colorectal cancer liver metastases in a state at war: A prospective cohort study.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic S7 and S4 segmentectomy combined with transverse colon resection for synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Validation of tumor burden score as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastases patients: a retrospective analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Laennec's approach for central liver resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis adjacent to the hepatic hilum that occurred 10 years after colectomy: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the last three decades, the world surgical community successfully adopted different surgical strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with liver metastases (LM), however, we are still seeing the evolution of treatment guidelines. The purpose of the study was to analyze a 20-year evolution of CRC patients with LM being treated in a specialized state Ukrainian oncological center. Materials and methods: The retrospective analysis of 1118 CRC patient cases using prospectively collected patient data from the National Cancer Institute registry. The time ranges between 2000-2010 and 2011-2022 and the LM manifestation - metachronous (M0)/synchronous (M1) were the two main grouping criteria. Results: The overall survival 5-year survival of patients who had surgery between 2000-2011 and 2012-2022 was 51.3 and 58.2% ( Conclusions: It was shown the improvement of the oncological prognosis for CRC patients with synchronous LM who were treated after 2012. The adaptation of world experience algorithms and the surgical strategy evolution have become the root cause of the above.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.