ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Designing a minimum dataset for autism spectrum disorder registry in Iran.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) has been showing a marked increase over the past 20 years. Therefore, a uniform data gathering system for ASD registration could prominently enhance plans for managing ASD worldwide. So, in the current investigation the authors aimed to design and validate the Persian version of a minimum dataset (MDS) for being administered in the national ASD registries. Methods: The current study is a mixed-method study with both quantitative and qualitative methods providing and validating a form of MDS in four phases according to Delphi method. The proposed MDS consisted of 11 categories containing coding responses. Content validity (CV) was evaluated based on 20 expert's suggestions and opinions. Item-CV Index (I-CVI) and Scale-CVI were administered to evaluate and validate the items and questions in the proposed MDS. Results: Twenty researchers from different disciplines scored each question and item. By taking into account the scores, the validity appraisal was provided for each item by computing the I-CVI value. Results showed that 41 out of 76 items had the value I-CVI less than 0.78 and were kept as relevant; 35 items were eliminated due to a value below 0.70. The Scale-CVI /Ave of the relevance for the entire form was 0.9396. Conclusion: The Persian version of MDS for ASD registry was found to be valid. Such MDS can be utilitarian for health cares and policymaking purposes by gathering and updating standard data for developing local and national registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.