ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
ERCP practice at a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir, North India: a large single-center cross-sectional study with focus on quality indicators, success rate, and indications.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pediatric and adult populations: 17-year experience from Pakistan with trends, complications, and global comparison.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most technically demanding endoscopic procedure with significant adverse events that mandate appropriate training, competence and careful decision-making. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) updated a list of quality indicators and performance measures for pancreatobiliary endoscopy. Nevertheless, real-life data are scarce, especially from developing countries. The study aimed to assess overall quality, procedural success, and indications of ERCP at our center. Methods: An audit of our endoscopy center at the start of the study for quality and performance indicators and a retrospective analysis of the 4 years of the prospectively maintained data of patients who underwent ERCP regarding procedural success and indications was done. Results: The study showed that ERCP is performed by meeting good quality standards, but structured training, sedation practice, and microbiological surveillance are subpar. A total of 3544 procedures were carried out with successful cannulation of the naive papilla in 93%, with 60% of procedures carried out on females, 80.5% of procedures done for benign diseases, and 19.5% on suspected or proven malignancy (47% men and 53% women) with perihilar obstruction being commonest in both sexes (32-33%) followed by carcinoma gallbladder in women (21%) and distal cholangiocarcinoma in men (27%). Among benign diseases (2711), 12% had benign pancreatic diseases, and 64.8% had common bile duct (CBD) stones, with 31% of CBD stones requiring more than one session for clearance. Conclusion: ERCP at our center is performed by meeting quality standards and by competent endoscopists with good procedural success. Improving sedation strategies, microbiological surveillance, and training programs remains an unmet need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.