Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228912›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Morphometric analysis of foramen ovale, foramen spinosum, and foramen rotundum of human skull using computed tomography scan: a cross-sectional study.

Rakshya Bhattarai, Sagar Panthi, Gopal K Yadav, Siddhartha Bhandari, Rochana Acharya, Ananta Sharma, Pratima K Shah, Sarun Koirala, Manoj Bhattarai, Mukesh K Gupta and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Foramen rotundum versus canal of the maxillary verve.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026
    Article
  2. [Novel framework based on multi-stage random sampling and differentiable rendering for automated three-dimensional orientation estimation of skull base foramina].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rakshya BhattaraiDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging.
Sagar PanthiSurgery.
Gopal K YadavDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging.
Siddhartha BhandariDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rochana AcharyaInternal Medicine.
Ananta SharmaDepartment of Surgery, Kist Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur.
Pratima K ShahDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging.
Sarun KoiralaAnatomy, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Manoj BhattaraiDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging.
Mukesh K GuptaDepartments of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging.
Bhawani KhanalSurgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited literature of objective assessments of foramina of skull base using computed tomography (CT) scan. This study was carried out to analyze the dimensions of foramen ovale (FO), foramen spinosum (FS), and foramen rotundum (FR) using CT scan imaging of the human skull and their associations with sex, age, and laterality of the body. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Nepal using a purposive sampling method. We included 96 adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent CT scan of the head for any clinical indications. All those participants below 18 years, inadequate visualization or erosions of skull base foramina, and/or not consenting were excluded. Appropriate statistical calculations were done using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 21. The Results: The mean length, width, and area of FO was 7.79±1.10 mm, 3.68±0.64 mm, and 22.80±6.18 mm Conclusions: The sex-based difference in dimensions of FO and FS should be clinically considered in evaluating the pathology of these foramina. However, further studies using objective assessment of foraminal dimensions are required to draw obvious inferences.

Indexed as

human skullmorphometric analysisobjective measurementsizes of foramina

Identifiers

PMID37228912
PMCPMC10205317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.