Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228800›Full record

ArticleUCL open. Environment2021

Synergies and trade-offs between sanitation and the sustainable development goals.

Priti Parikh, Loan Diep, Pascale Hofmann, Julia Tomei, Luiza C Campos, Tse-Hui Teh, Yacob Mulugetta, Ben Milligan, Monica Lakhanpaul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in UCL open. Environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priti ParikhEngineering for International Development Centre, Bartlett School of Construction Project Management, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-4190
Loan DiepEngineering for International Development Centre, Bartlett School of Construction Project Management, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Pascale HofmannEnvironmental and Sustainable Development, The Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London, 34 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK.
Julia TomeiEnergy, Resources and Development, UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK.
Luiza C CamposEnvironmental Engineering, Centre for Urban Sustainability and Resilience, Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Tse-Hui TehThe Bartlett School of Planning, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK.
Yacob MulugettaEnergy and Development Policy, UCL Department of Science, Technology, Engineering & Public Policy (STEaPP), Shropshire House (4th Fl), 11-20 Caper Street, London WC1E 6JA, UK.
Ben MilliganSustainable Development Law and Policy, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Monica LakhanpaulIntegrated Community Child Health, Population, Policy & Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better leverage opportunities arising out of sustainable and inclusive management of sanitation services there is a need for robust and comprehensive evidence of the wide-ranging benefits that sanitation can deliver. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive framework for sustainable development broken down into 169 interconnected Targets which are articulated under 17 Goals. Based on a methodology developed at University College London (UCL), this study identifies linkages between sanitation and the 169 Targets corroborated by published evidence. We show that there are synergies between sanitation and all 17 Goals and 130 (77%) of the Targets, and trade-offs for 28 (17%) of the Targets. We identified 83 Targets (49%) that call for action in the sanitation sector. The results demonstrate the far-reaching benefits that can be unlocked from investment in sanitation, which extend beyond health and spread across sectors. The evidence base for the 17 Goals establishes links that can inform cross-sectoral action, collaborations and investment across governance levels for integrated sanitation solutions. The research provides different stakeholders with a framework that can be applied to context-specific cases and projects. We propose a range of recommendations to policy makers, practitioners and researchers who seek to take this study further to help achieve the SDGs.

Indexed as

cross-sectoral partnershipsinterdisciplinarysanitationSDGsustainable developmentsynergiesthe environmenttrade-offswater

Identifiers

PMID37228800
PMCPMC10208324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.