ArticleJournal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing2023
The role of explainable Artificial Intelligence in high-stakes decision-making systems: a systematic review.
Article in Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Team decision-making in high-stakes time-pressured environments: what helps and what hinders?CJEM · 2026Article
- A pilot study on the impact of large language model assistance on the evaluation of complex medical living kidney donor candidates.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Neonatal nurses' experiences with generative AI in clinical decision-making: a qualitative exploration in high-risk nicus.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Current methods in explainable artificial intelligence and future prospects for integrative physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of pathogen emergence and evolution in the world of synthetic biology.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Violence Risk Assessment: Emerging Technology and the Ethics of the Inevitable.Behavioral sciences & the lawArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A high-stakes event is an extreme risk with a low probability of occurring, but severe consequences (e.g., life-threatening conditions or economic collapse). The accompanying lack of information is a source of high-stress pressure and anxiety for emergency medical services authorities. Deciding on the best proactive plan and action in this environment is a complicated process, which calls for intelligent agents to automatically produce knowledge in the manner of human-like intelligence. Research in high-stakes decision-making systems has increasingly focused on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), but recent developments in prediction systems give little prominence to explanations based on human-like intelligence. This work investigates XAI based on cause-and-effect interpretations for supporting high-stakes decisions. We review recent applications in the first aid and medical emergency fields based on three perspectives: available data, desirable knowledge, and the use of intelligence. We identify the limitations of recent AI, and discuss the potential of XAI for dealing with such limitations. We propose an architecture for high-stakes decision-making driven by XAI, and highlight likely future trends and directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.