Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228669›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study.

Julia Felber, Benedikt Gross, Arend Rahrisch, Eric Waltersbacher, Evelyn Trips, Percy Schröttner, Guido Fitze, Jurek Schultz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial profiles in pediatric complicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia FelberDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Benedikt GrossDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Arend RahrischDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Eric WaltersbacherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Evelyn TripsCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Percy SchröttnerInstitute for Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Guido FitzeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jurek SchultzDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Dresden - Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DEHochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is a frequent condition, with peak incidences in the second decade of life. Its pathogenesis is under debate, but bacterial infections are crucial, and antibiotic treatment remains essential. Rare bacteria are accused of causing complications, and various calculated antibiotics are propagated, yet there is no comprehensive microbiological analysis of pediatric appendicitis. Here we review different pre-analytic pathways, identify rare and common bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistances, correlate clinical courses, and evaluate standard calculated antibiotics in a large pediatric cohort. Method: We reviewed 579 patient records and microbiological results of intraoperative swabs in standard Amies agar media or fluid samples after appendectomies for appendicitis between May 2011 and April 2019. Bacteria were cultured and identified Results: Of 579 analyzed patients, in 372 patients we got 1330 bacterial growths with resistograms. 1259 times, bacteria could be identified to species level. 102 different bacteria could be cultivated. 49% of catarrhal and 52% of phlegmonous appendices resulted in bacterial growth. In gangrenous appendicitis, only 38% remained sterile, while this number reduced to 4% after perforation. Many fluid samples remained sterile even when unsterile swabs had been taken simultaneously. 40 common enteral genera were responsible for 76.5% of bacterial identifications in 96.8% of patients. However, 69 rare bacteria were found in 187 patients without specifically elevated risk for complications. Conclusion: Amies agar gel swabs performed superior to fluid samples and should be a standard in appendectomies. Even catarrhal appendices were only sterile in 51%, which is interesting in view of a possible viral cause. According to our resistograms, the best

Indexed as

AppendicitisAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAgarAnti-Bacterial Agentsanti-infective treatmentcomplicationsoutcomepediatric appendicitisrare bacteria

Identifiers

PMID37228669
PMCPMC10205019
OpenAlexW4378348299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.