ArticleIranian journal of biotechnology2023
Preparation and Characterization of Crayfish (
Article in Iranian journal of biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Active Biopolymers and Chitosan-Based Films from Non-Native Crayfish Shell.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Valorization of Corn Steep Liquor and Glycerol for Fungal Chitosan Production by Mucorales from Brazilian Biomes: Structural Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Supplementing NSP enzymes in high concentrate diets can prevent foamy rumen bloat in goats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, chitosan with various deacetylation degrees was extracted from crayfish ( Objectives: Recycling of wastes has become an important issue with the advancement of shellfish processing technology. Therefore, this study examined the most important and conventional characterization parameters of chitosan extracted from crayfish shells and investigated whether crayfish chitosan can be an alternative to commercial products. Material and Methods: In order to determine the characterization of the chitosan; degree of deacetylation, yield, molecular weight, apparent viscosity, water binding capacity, fat binding capacity, moisture content, ash content, color properties, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction analyses (XRD) were applied. Results: The low (LDD) and high (HDD) deacetylated crayfish chitosan characterization results in terms of yield, molecular weight, apparent viscosity, water binding capacity, fat binding capacity, moisture content, ash content were 17.50%, 424.03-334.66 kDa, 16.82-9.63 cP, 481.29-428.04%, 419.30-355.75%, 3.32-1.03%, 0.98-1.01%, respectively. As detected by two different methods, potentiometric titration and elemental analysis, the deacetylation degrees of low and high crayfish chitosan were found close to each other, which were 76.98-94.98% and 73.79-92.06%, respectively. As the deacetylation period extended, acetyl groups were removed, and the degree of the deacetylation of crayfish chitosan increased while the apparent viscosity, molecular weight, water and fat binding capacity decreased. Conclusions: The findings of the present study are important to obtain the chitosan having various physicochemical characteristics from unevaluated crayfish wastes and to use it in many different sectors, especially biotechnology, medicine, pharmaceutical, food, and agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.