ArticleCureus2023
Can Emergency Physicians Diagnose Cirrhosis by Ultrasound: A Prospective Single-Arm Educational Intervention.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose Liver cirrhosis is common, and timely diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis may impact acute care and resuscitation. Point-of-care ultrasound is a core competency of US emergency medicine training and is increasingly available in many acute care settings, including those where usual diagnostic modalities of cirrhosis may not be available. Only a few works of literature exist that evaluate the ultrasound diagnosis of cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis by emergency physicians (EPs). We aim to evaluate whether EPs can diagnose cirrhosis by ultrasound after a brief educational intervention and determine the accuracy of EP-interpreted ultrasound compared to the radiology-interpreted ultrasound as a gold standard. Methods This single-center prospective single-arm educational intervention evaluated the accuracy of EPs diagnosing cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis on ultrasound before and after a short educational intervention. Responses were paired across the three assessments, and paired sample t-tests were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated using attending radiology-interpreted ultrasounds as the gold standard. Results EPs scored a mean of 16% higher on a delayed knowledge assessment one month after the educational intervention than on the pre-intervention assessment. EP-interpreted ultrasound revealed a sensitivity of 0.90, specificity of 0.71, positive likelihood ratio of 3.08, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.14 compared to radiology-interpreted ultrasound. The sensitivity of our cohort was 0.98 for decompensated cirrhosis. Conclusions After a brief educational intervention, EPs can significantly increase their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing cirrhosis using ultrasound. EPs were particularly sensitive in their diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.