Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228449›Full record

ArticleArchaeological and anthropological sciences2023

Production method of the Königsaue birch tar documents cumulative culture in Neanderthals.

Patrick Schmidt, Tabea J Koch, Matthias A Blessing, F Alexandros Karakostis, Katerina Harvati, Veit Dresely, Armelle Charrié-Duhaut

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
68.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decentring the central science.Nature chemistry · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick SchmidtEarly Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8727-6127
Tabea J KochEarly Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-2554
Matthias A BlessingEarly Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-7811
F Alexandros KarakostisDFG Centre for Advanced Studies "Words, Bones, Genes, Tools", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-4332
Katerina HarvatiDFG Centre for Advanced Studies "Words, Bones, Genes, Tools", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4794
Veit DreselyState Office for Heritage Management and Archaeology Saxony-Anhalt - State Museum of Prehistory, Halle, Germany.
Armelle Charrié-DuhautLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Des Interactions Et Des Systèmes (LSMIS), Strasbourg University, CNRS, UMR 7140, Strasbourg, CMC France.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-5670
University of Tübingen · DESenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLower Saxony State Museum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birch tar is the oldest synthetic substance made by early humans. The earliest such artefacts are associated with Neanderthals. According to traditional interpretations, their study allows understanding Neanderthal tool behaviours, skills and cultural evolution. However, recent work has found that birch tar can also be produced with simple processes, or even result from fortuitous accidents. Even though these findings suggest that birch tar per se is not a proxy for cognition, they do not shed light on the process by which Neanderthals produced it, and, therefore, cannot evaluate the implications of that behaviour. Here, we address the question of how tar was made by Neanderthals. Through a comparative chemical analysis of the two exceptional birch tar pieces from Königsaue (Germany) and a large reference birch tar collection made with Stone Age techniques, we found that Neanderthals did not use the simplest method to make tar. Rather, they distilled tar in an intentionally created underground environment that restricted oxygen flow and remained invisible during the process. This degree of complexity is unlikely to have been invented spontaneously. Our results suggest that Neanderthals invented or developed this process based on previous simpler methods and constitute one of the clearest indicators of cumulative cultural evolution in the European Middle Palaeolithic. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-023-01789-2.

Indexed as

AdhesivesCognitive complexityEarly pyrotechnologyModern behavioursTransformative technologies

Identifiers

PMID37228449
PMCPMC10202989
OpenAlexW4377289954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.