ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Nasal nitric oxide in healthy Chinese children aged 6-18 years.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between combined allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome in children and nitric oxide: mechanisms, clinical significance, and research progress.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Feasibility of FnNO measurement in preschoolers and development of predictive models.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Dual Role of Nitric Oxide in Allergic Rhinitis: From the NO/cGMP Signaling Pathway to Possible New Therapeutic Targets for Organelle Damage.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Clinical Applications of Nasal Nitric Oxide in Allergic Rhinitis: A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To obtain the normal values of fractional concentration of nasal nitric oxide in Chinese children aged 6-18 years, so as to provide reference for clinical diagnosis. Methods: 2,580 out of 3,200 children (1,359 males and 1,221 females), whom were included from 12 centers around China were taken tests, their height and weight were also recorded. Data were used to analyze the normal range and influencing factors of fractional concentration of nasal nitric oxide values. Measurements: Data was measured using the Nano Coulomb Breath Analyzer (Sunvou-CA2122, Wuxi, China), according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) recommendations. Main Results: We calculated the normal range and prediction equation of fractional concentration of nasal nitric oxide values in Chinese children aged 6-18 years. The mean FnNO values of Chinese aged 6-18 yrs was 454.5 ± 176.2 ppb, and 95% of them were in the range of 134.5-844.0 ppb. The prediction rule of FnNO values for Chinese children aged 6-11 yrs was: FnNO = 298.881 + 17.974 × age. And for children aged 12-18 yrs was: FnNO = 579.222-30.332 × (male = 0, female = 1)-5.503 × age. Conclusions: Sex and age were two significant predictors of FnNO values for Chinese children(aged 12-18 yrs). Hopefully this study can provide some reference value for clinical diagnosis in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.